The results of our our evaluation of the RG Score were rather discouraging: while there are some innovative ideas in the way ResearchGate approached the measure, we also found that the RG Score ignores a number of fundamental bibliometric guidelines and that ResearchGate makes basic mistakes in the way the score is calculated. We deem these shortcomings to be so problematic that the RG Score should not be considered as a measure of scientific reputation in its current form.
Interesting read about reverse engineering the blackbox ResearchGate score. I have considered that score useless for a long time and think about closing my account every time they send me one of those annoying emails. But unfortunately RG has become so widely used that they drive a considerable number of readers to my papers, so I guess I’ll just keep on putting up with these annoyances. I just hope people don’t start taking that score seriously.
Handy tool if you want to cite a book, but are too lazy to put together the BibTex entry yourself. To comply with the Amazon API that it uses to generate the BibTex code, the entry includes the link to the book on Amazon, but that’s easy enough to remove.
I almost forgot to mention that our group finally has a proper website.
Awesome idea for a course by Carl Bergstrom and Jevin West at the University of Washington in Seattle:
The world is awash in bullshit. Politicians are unconstrained by facts. Science is conducted by press release. So-called higher education often rewards bullshit over analytic thought. Startup culture has elevated bullshit to high art. Advertisers wink conspiratorially and invite us to join them in seeing through all the bullshit, then take advantage of our lowered guard to bombard us with second-order bullshit. The majority of administrative activity, whether in private business or the public sphere, often seems to be little more than a sophisticated exercise in the combinatorial reassembly of bullshit.
We’re sick of it. It’s time to do something, and as educators, one constructive thing we know how to do is to teach people. So, the aim of this course is to help students navigate the bullshit-rich modern environment by identifying bullshit, seeing through it, and combatting it with effective analysis and argument.
I would definitely have taken a course that has Harry G. Frankfurt’s On Bullshit as its first reading. Let’s hope they get the university administration to approve it.
If you have a few minutes to spare (or need some cheering up after one of your papers has been rejected), here’s a nice read:
Guillaume Cabanac (2015) Unconventional academic writing.
Cabanac wrote this as an addendum to Hartley’s Academic writing and publishing: A practical handbook (2008), and as a present for Hartley’s 75th birthday. It contains lots of unusual – and very funny – titles, papers, and figures, all of which have been published in academic journals. My favorite may be this one-page paper on writer’s block:
Hat tip to Viola Voß for the pointer.
In this great article, Lisa Charlotte Rost gives you a crash course to the use of color in data visualisation (and mapping, for that matter). It covers some theory, lots of useful links to classics such as ColorBrewer and less-known tools such as this awesome R library that provides color schemes based on Wes Anderson movies (yes, seriously).
This slide deck from FOSS4G 2016 originally only got my attention because of the truly awesome title, but it turns out Erik Escoffier has some tricks up his sleeve that I didn’t know. Worth a look if you’re frequently writing code that does geo stuff.
I just learned about Open Reblock from my students. Very cool project:
Reblocking is the process of physically transforming an informal settlement to provide an access path to all its structures. This project analyzes the spatial structure of informal city blocks, and uses an algorithm to suggest reblocking solutions that provide access to all structures within the block in a minimally disruptive way.
Interesting read about what can happen if you use a technology – IP addresses in this case – for something completely different than it was meant to:
For the last decade, Taylor and her renters have been visited by all kinds of mysterious trouble. They’ve been accused of being identity thieves, spammers, scammers and fraudsters. They’ve gotten visited by FBI agents, federal marshals, IRS collectors, ambulances searching for suicidal veterans, and police officers searching for runaway children. They’ve found people scrounging around in their barn. The renters have been doxxed, their names and addresses posted on the internet by vigilantes. Once, someone left a broken toilet in the driveway as a strange, indefinite threat.
The title is a little bit misleading – it’s not really a mapping glitch, but I can see how using IP-based geocoding in the title would turn most readers away without even reading the first sentence of the article.
Andrej Verity tells the story of the Humanitarian eXchange Language. Even though it turned out very different from our initial prototype, I’m glad it is still going strong. I learned a lot working on the HXL prototype and had a great time with the guys at UN OCHA.